Peer Review Policy

1. Initial Evaluation of Manuscripts
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by the editor to ensure their alignment with the journal’s scope and focus. Manuscripts are assessed for originality, relevance, methodology, and their scientific contribution to the field of agriculture. Submissions that fail to meet these basic criteria will be returned to the authors without proceeding to further review.

2. Type of Peer Review
This journal employs a double-blind review system, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other. This ensures an unbiased and objective evaluation process.

3. Review Reports
Reviewers are required to provide a comprehensive report on the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, including comments on clarity, relevance, research methodology, data analysis, and conclusions. The review report should include constructive suggestions to help authors improve their work.

4. Decision
The final decision on manuscript acceptance is made by the editor based on reviewers’ feedback. There are four possible outcomes: (1) accepted without revisions, (2) accepted with minor revisions, (3) accepted with major revisions, or (4) rejected. The editor will provide clear explanations to the authors regarding the decision.